Hi Adalbert, > actually I donīt understand why you are using cache files. As I understand > it, using caches is only useful when you canīt for whatever reason archive > your logfiles, and esp. gzip them so that their size is substantially > reduced.
So, you mean i should work with the growing number of log-files which are gzipped for example by logrotate? thats an idea... > Strangely, if analog needs 2 minutes for one day, it still can take 8 > hours for a full month (on a fairly recent PC with 768 MB memory usage > will grow to to 1.2 GB while analyzing a full month with analog) - but as > I understand it the tables to store all those values are much bigger so it > is inevitable. in this paragraph, are you talking about using log-files without the cache file or using the cache file? Does i understand you correctly? it needs more disk space to store the values in the cache file (which "tables" do you mean?) thanks Andi Leppert ____________________________________________________________________ Der WEB.DE Virenschutz schuetzt Ihr Postfach vor dem Wurm Sober.A-F! Kostenfrei fuer FreeMail Nutzer. http://f.web.de/?mc=021158 +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | Digest version: http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help-digest/ | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------
