Aengus schrieb:

APACHELOGFORMAT is only relevant if you have access to the .conf file
for an Apache web server - instead of "translating" the logformat in
that .conf file, Analog can use it directly once you tell it that is
using Apache syntax rather than Analog syntax.
Ok, of course I don't have access.

If you are writing the LOGFORMAT from scratch, then you don't want to use the APACHELOGFORMAT directive.
OK

Is there supposed to be a space between the referrer and the Browser? If you don't have a space, that would explain why Analog can recognize the format.
yes there is a space. Is the format of my service provider's logfile not standard?

80.132.229.184 - - [17/Jun/2004:00:02:16 +0200]
"GET /CEK-Module.htm HTTP/1.1" 304 - www.conelek.com "http://www.google.de/search?q=Breadboard&hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&start=20&sa=N"; "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)" "-"


There are Spaces between all fields.


LOGFORMAT (%S %j %u [%d/%M/%Y:%h:%n:%j] "%j %r %j" %c %b %v "%f""%B" "%j")

looks like it will do the job (no space between %f and %B).

I made a space between %f and %B and it works. :) Thank you.
Tomorrow I will try to understand the difference between the LOGFORMAT that Analog expects and your LOGFORMAT. Please can you give me the LOGFORMAT which is used by Analog?


Thanks in advance

Ruediger








+------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | Digest version: http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help-digest/ | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to