Aengus schrieb:
Ok, of course I don't have access.APACHELOGFORMAT is only relevant if you have access to the .conf file for an Apache web server - instead of "translating" the logformat in that .conf file, Analog can use it directly once you tell it that is using Apache syntax rather than Analog syntax.
OK
If you are writing the LOGFORMAT from scratch, then you don't want to use the APACHELOGFORMAT directive.
yes there is a space. Is the format of my service provider's logfile not standard?
Is there supposed to be a space between the referrer and the Browser? If you don't have a space, that would explain why Analog can recognize the format.
80.132.229.184 - - [17/Jun/2004:00:02:16 +0200]
"GET /CEK-Module.htm HTTP/1.1" 304 - www.conelek.com "http://www.google.de/search?q=Breadboard&hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&start=20&sa=N" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)" "-"
There are Spaces between all fields.
LOGFORMAT (%S %j %u [%d/%M/%Y:%h:%n:%j] "%j %r %j" %c %b %v "%f""%B" "%j")
looks like it will do the job (no space between %f and %B).
I made a space between %f and %B and it works. :) Thank you.
Tomorrow I will try to understand the difference between the LOGFORMAT that Analog expects and your LOGFORMAT. Please can you give me the LOGFORMAT which is used by Analog?
Thanks in advance
Ruediger
+------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | Digest version: http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help-digest/ | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------