If you actually run analog again, I think you will find that you have no problems running it at all. Or any other program.
-- Jeremy Wadsack Seven Simple Machines
Lee Evans wrote:
This is surely impossible. It's under the control of the OS, not theprogram,
and any OS which didn't free memory when programs quit would crash veryquickly indeed.
Maybe whatever tool you are using isn't reporting the free memoryaccurately>
(or at least, not reporting a useful statistic).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] local]# cat /proc/meminfo total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached: Mem: 1188331520 1123258368 65073152 0 14237696 1057882112 Swap: 271425536 9392128 262033408
No other programs seem to have the same effect (if I don't run analog the system never seems to touch even 300mb used), despite this the system does appear completely stable (even if a little sluggish!)
+------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | Digest version: http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help-digest/ | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------