I think the timing you're referring to is due to some 'incremental' mode of analog. I might have also found an answer to why the Directory report is wrong, it's probably due to some bug in incremental running, where it fails to add up all earlier Directory List reports properly. However found another report that ran for about an hour (btw, this is an old BSD PIII box), and the #'s still don't seem to add up, but it's closer 32mil for dirs vs 192mil for 'successful req's for pages'
Everything else seems to add up properly.. (browser report, daily, weekly reports) Such a pain, now we'll have to rerun all/most reports for 2004. Where would a directory be excluded? I looked at some file -- analog.cfg, and didn't see anything there. Plus the directories seem right in proportion, just not enough page views per dir. -Andrey On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Stephen Turner wrote: > On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Andrey Dmitriev wrote: > > > > Wanted to try to understand this discrepancy while analyzing an old Analog > > report, that I didn't run (or setup). > > > > Wow. You analysed 100M requests in 2 mins 40 secs? What sort of hardware is > this running on? > > > It says Successful Page Requests (at the top) at 95mil, but when I try to > > add up all the directories, they actually only add up to 2.4Mil or so. > > > > What am I doing wrong? > > > > Is it possible that there is a large directory which has been deliberately > excluded from the report? > > +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------
