Aengus,
That is worth the try. I will however make it a few more lines than that just for kicks.
Michael
| "Aengus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/25/2005 10:22 AM
|
To: "Support for analog web log analyzer" <[email protected]> cc: (bcc: Mike Jenkins-MW/PGI) Subject: Re: [analog-help] Still Having problems with 'Successful ServerRequests' Count |
On Friday, February 25, 2005 3:09 PM [GMT],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Stephen,
>>
>> No. looked at adding PAGEINCLUDES but wondered why would there be
>> such a change over just a month. Like I said in my latest email,
>> I did a egrep and found a count that looks right. This was using
>> the default page type and my existing PAGEINCLUDEs:
>>
>> PAGEINCLUDE *.shtml
>> PAGEINCLUDE *.asp
>> PAGEINCLUDE *.jsp
>> PAGEINCLUDE *.cfm
>> PAGEINCLUDE *.pl
>> PAGEINCLUDE *.php
>>
>> So I am still confused and is why I am posting again.
If you create a 6 line logfile, with one entry for each of the filetypes
you have defined, does Analog give you the report you expect
Aengus
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
| http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
| Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
| List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
+------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------
