On Wednesday, July 06, 2005 5:31 AM [EDT], Richard Taubo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi! > > I have set up a system where my logfiles are split into a separate > logfile for each domain. > Due to some server problems I have a backlog of logfiles that are not > processed. > If I start to split these files and add them to the current logfiles > for each domain, I will end up with a log file from each domain that > will have data not ordered in chronological order, i.e the file will > have an order like this: > - Oldest log data (1) > - Newest log data (3) > - Older log data (2) > > Does Analog have a problem to process a single logfile that is not > ordered chronological? > (I know I can process multiple logfiles from different time periods > together in one go, but I am not sure if the dates in each of these > files have to be ordered chronologically?). > > Thanks for input! :-) The simplest way to answer any question about Analog is to try it - it often takes less time than it takes to post a message to the list. In this case, the answer is that Analog doesn't care that your logfiles won't be in order. Aengus +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
