On Monday, July 25, 2005 1:55 PM [EDT], Jason Linhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am seeing slightly lower numbers of "Distinct hosts served" than I > get when manually counting them. The definition of "Distinct hosts > served" is a little vague in the manual. It says only "the number of > different computers requests have come from". > > As far as I can tell, hosts with only errors are not getting counted. > If that is what Analog is designed to do, it would be nice if that was > explained more clearly in the manual. If that is not what was intended > then the distinct host counts are too low. The Host Report is based on the successful requests. The Host Failure Report is based on failed requests. While it could be argued that the Summary entry should report all hosts, it would actually require a 3rd table, as you can't just combine the total from the first two, as some hosts would occur in both tables. The documentation should probably say "the number of different computers sucessful requests have come from". "Distinct files requested" also refers only to successful requests. Aengus +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
