Thanks for the responses and suggestions. Again, I have no desire to look up the thousands of IPs every day, just 100. I guess I'll keep doing what I've always done.
(To make this work, we would need a post-processing program that would go though the analog .html report, find the IP addresses, resolve them and create a new column with the domain names. :) If anyone is interested in writing this, let me know.) Thanks again. --- Carl von Einem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://analog.cx/helpers/#dns works better > > regards, > Carl > > From: "Jeremy Wadsack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > [...] > > > > There are also a host of helper applications that > can do asynchronous, > > multithreaded lookups much faster than Analog. See > > http://analog.cx/docs/helpers/#dns. > > +------------------------------------------------------------------------ > | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: > | > http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help > | > | Analog Documentation: > http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html > | List archives: > http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives > | Usenet version: > news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general > +------------------------------------------------------------------------ > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
