On Thursday, March 02, 2006 12:24 AM [EDT], Michael & Rochelle Ireland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ugh ... I swear I read this already, but I can't find it. Anyway, > everything is working fine with Analog, except my REFSORTBY and > REFSITESORTBY commands. I get this error: > > analog: Warning D: In Referrer Report, SORTBY (last date) doesn't > match ARGSSORTBY (requests) That's not an error, it's a warning. If you don't see anything wrong with the output, you can just ignore it. The message explains exactly what is wrong - you've changed the default sort order for REFSORTBY, but you haven't changed the default sortorder for REFARGSORTBY. Because the Referrer Report can be hierarchical (entries with arguments can be broken down to give extra detail) you'll find that the nested parts of the Referrer Report are sorted differently. That might be good, it might be bad, or it might not matter (you might not have any referers with arguments). > Okay, so I am thinking I have a SORTBY somewhere calling for > requests, but I don't. Does it have to do with having my FLOOR set > to 1R? No. > I don't think so, because I have HOSTSORTBY DATE and HOSTFLOOR 1R, > and the hosts sort just fine. So why can't I have REFSORTBY DATE and > REFFLOOR 1R? The Host Report isn't hierarchical. Aengus +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
