You can still use Analog - you just have to run it once for each IP (or
once for each search phrase) using the appropriate *INCLUDE command. You
could then post-process the results (Analog has both a computer-readable
output format and an XML output format) and generate your combined
report.

If Analog were to try to tally this all in 'one pass' it would have to
do substantially the same amount of work as running many times for each
word or IP. See http://analog.cx/docs/faq.html#faq128

--
 
Jeremy Wadsack
Seven Simple Machines

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicholas C.
Shears
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 7:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [analog-help] Show IP# in searchword report

>> Is it possible to customize the "Search Word Report" so it shows the
>> visitor's IP number for each search word?

>No. For a start, what would Analog display if 10 people searched on a
single 
>word?

For 10 people searching on a single word, we'd need all 10 IP numbers.
We'll use perl instead. We'd only hoped to use Analog because it does a
nice job distinguishing the different search engines.


+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
|  TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
|    http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
|  Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
|  List archives:  http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
|  Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-

+------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
|    http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
|  Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
|  List archives:  http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
|  Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
+------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to