Aengus wrote: > Analog differentiates between successful and unsuccessful > requests, so the number of requests or pages counted in the > Request Report or the Host Report etc are successful requests. > To see the number of failed attempts to access a particular > file you look in the Failure Report, or to see the number > of failed request from a particluar host, see the Host > Failure report, etc. > > Differentiating between successful and unsuccessful > requests makes Analog better at failure analysis, not worse.
I wasn't dissing Analog, merely talking from my understanding of what its own docs say about failure analysis. I understand some of the advantages of only using successful requests in many of the reports, I'm just saying that limiting it that way can sometimes prevent using some of the other reports to help tickle out failure details. ... Particularly when there is only so much control over the Failure report. fwiw, I hadn't tried the Host Failure report, but it's not really a help for this particular problem. Thanks for reminding me about it though. jw -- Jeff Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
