Eric Gorr wrote: > Since Analog 6.0 is the last version, I was wondering if people had > any opinion on what the next 'best' analyzer is or will be? >
I find it difficult to believe that no-one has picked up where Stephen left off - are there no developers on this list? I did some work (XML output) on analog myself about three years ago, but right now I just haven't got the time to get involved. There isn't really much of a learning curve - the package is just the source code and a Makefile. There's no SVN or autoconf to make things complicated :-) Even if an updated version couldn't be published at www.analog.cx, someone could still create a fork and publish that. /Per Jessen, Zürich +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
