Is this expected to slow stuff down on db1047 - or are the queries I'm running just horribly inefficient? ;)
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]>wrote: > Update: > > The migration is in progress. Small correction from before: > > >> We are changing EventLogging to write events to m2 instead of db1047. >> > > Correction: m1 instead of m2, and the new data will be written to db1048. > > Currently we're cautiously optimistic that we haven't dropped any data. > However, for now, db1047 is not receiving any new data from EventLogging. > All the new data is going into db1048. The old data is being loaded into > 1048 as well, and should complete over the next day or so. Once done, > we'll replicate to db1047 from db1048 and that should be it. We'll keep > updating this thread. > > _______________________________________________ > Engineering mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/engineering > > -- Maryana Pinchuk Product Manager, Wikimedia Foundation wikimediafoundation.org
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
