+1

For example, the last time I sent a similar email to the list, it was for
the wiki_info table.  One of the tasks I have is to break the code for
generating that table out of the analysis project it lives in and make it a
separate repo so that Oliver can send pull requests to fix issues and/or
maintain his own managed table.

It would be great to work towards an architecture that allows us to keep
these tables up-to-date without user-based cron jobs.

-Aaron

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]>
wrote:

> This is great.  I'd like to go on record saying that this is leaning
> towards a data warehouse kind of approach - basically pre-aggregating
> useful datasets.  So we might want to do this in a more organized way down
> the line.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> This is fricking awesome!
>>
>>
>>  On 12 June 2014 10:58, Aaron Halfaker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I created a new table on analytics-store.eqiad.wmnet.  It contains the
>>> monthly edit counts for all wikis.  See a brief overview below.
>>>
>>> Note that the "revisions" column contains a count of all revisions --
>>> archived or not.  The "archived" column contains a count of archived
>>> revisions.   So revisions - archived == non-archived revisions.
>>>
>>> analytics-store.eqiad.wmnet [staging]> explain editor_month;
>>> +-------------------+----------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
>>> | Field             | Type           | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
>>> +-------------------+----------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
>>> | wiki              | varbinary(50)  | NO   | PRI |         |       |
>>> | month             | varbinary(7)   | NO   | PRI |         |       |
>>> | user_id           | int(11)        | NO   | PRI | 0       |       |
>>> | user_name         | varbinary(191) | YES  |     | NULL    |       |
>>> | user_registration | varbinary(14)  | YES  |     | NULL    |       |
>>> | archived          | int(11)        | YES  |     | NULL    |       |
>>> | revisions         | int(11)        | YES  |     | NULL    |       |
>>> +-------------------+----------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
>>> 7 rows in set (0.01 sec)
>>>
>>> analytics-store.eqiad.wmnet [staging]> select * from editor_month limit
>>> 3;
>>>
>>> +--------+---------+---------+------------+-------------------+----------+-----------+
>>> | wiki   | month   | user_id | user_name  | user_registration | archived
>>> | revisions |
>>>
>>> +--------+---------+---------+------------+-------------------+----------+-----------+
>>> | enwiki | 2001-01 |      34 | WojPob     | 20010129110725    |        0
>>> |        13 |
>>> | enwiki | 2001-01 |      99 | RoseParks  | 20010121021221    |        0
>>> |         7 |
>>> | enwiki | 2001-01 |     479 | JimboWales | 20010123223416    |        0
>>> |        13 |
>>>
>>> +--------+---------+---------+------------+-------------------+----------+-----------+
>>> 3 rows in set (0.03 sec)
>>>
>>> Feedback is welcome.   One of the next things, I'd like to do is remove
>>> the "-" from the month column as it ruins comparison with MW timestamps.
>>>
>>> -Aaron
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wmfresearch mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wmfresearch
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Oliver Keyes
>> Research Analyst
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Analytics mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

Reply via email to