On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Christian Aistleitner < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > Is there a plan for purging old data from this one? > > Just to make expectations explicit: > Since in a different part of this thread you are asking more for > expected growth bounds, I assume that the table can stay at that size > until discussion with Language about the way forward produced concrete > next steps, and you do not expect us to prune data right away. > Certainly the table can remain. We're not in danger of hitting any storage limit in the short term. > > There is a duplicate table called UniversalLanguageSelecTor-tofu_7629564 > -- > > note the uppercase T -- with a single row. Is that needed? > > I noted that too when looking at the issue last week, but decided > against calling it out, since it's just a single small table. > I expect we see these artifacts from time to time. Do they get in the > way somehow, or is it ok to just keep them around? > Fine to keep them around. This one just looked odd when combined with the first table's size, as though something generally odd was happening :-)
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
