The use of analytics staff resources is something that I take an interest in, and was expressing my qualified support for doing.
Pine On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Dan Garry <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15 July 2014 22:58, Pine W <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just a note that I still disagree with WMF's response to this RFC, more >> for procedural and wikilegal reasons than analytic ones. I won't rehash >> that debate here, and could support having more statistics collected, but >> it seems to me that the principled thing to do is for WMF to respect the >> RfC process first and work on further analytics second. I wish people >> success in gathering analytics that the community could consider in a >> future RfC. >> > > That discussion is very far outside the scope of this mailing list. > > Dan > > -- > Dan Garry > Associate Product Manager for Platform and Mobile Apps > Wikimedia Foundation > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
