I'm curious, what is the plan for transforming research outcomes into actionable proposals for on-wiki change?
Pine On Oct 16, 2014 10:54 AM, "Dan Andreescu" <[email protected]> wrote: > If I'm right, then it is important that we experiment with strategies for >> reinforcing/jump-starting Wikipedia's adaptive systems. One way to do that >> is to make it easier for editors to reflect on current trends. I'd like to >> think that integrating research practice into wiki culture (what I've been >> trying to do with all my work) is one way to do that. But it would be >> better if people don't need wait on me and other WMF researchers to finish >> a study. We'd all fare better if access to research materials was >> democratized. That's the reason I am really excited about projects like >> quarry.wmflabs.org (run SQL against Wikipedia's DBs from your browser). >> > > And that, in turn, is exactly why I'm really excited about our efforts to > simplify the schema that this data is presented in, so tools like quarry > can be even more approachable by folks, even those unfamiliar with SQL. > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
