>It sums to 67.328 for me [1]. You are right. I should have clarified that. In the list attached I only included device+browser combinations that represent at least 0.05% of traffic. I removed the longtail. Will send Jon a file with the longtail as he probably would care to see that.
>And I have no idea what our traffic for >Android 2.1 and 2.2 is and if it is significant e.g. more than 1% of >our traffic. >So the answer to this question (with preliminary data) is that neither 2.1 nor 2.2 amount to 0.05% of traffic to the mobile site. Should have said "So the answer to this question (with preliminary data) is that neither 2.1 nor 2.2 amount to 1% of traffic to the mobile site" On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Christian Aistleitner < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > [ leaving other things in this thread aside ] > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 07:15:03PM -0700, Nuria Ruiz wrote: > > iOS takes the cake which does not cease to amaze me. > > Not sure what exactly that means, but note that the long-tail got cut > off. Due to the way the data is sliced, I expect the “long-tail cut > off" to have thrown out a big part of requests from Android devices. > > Have fun, > Christian > > > -- > ---- quelltextlich e.U. ---- \\ ---- Christian Aistleitner ---- > Companies' registry: 360296y in Linz > Christian Aistleitner > Kefermarkterstrasze 6a/3 Email: [email protected] > 4293 Gutau, Austria Phone: +43 7946 / 20 5 81 > Fax: +43 7946 / 20 5 81 > Homepage: http://quelltextlich.at/ > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
