>
> Idle thought...
>
> It used to be that, when an image was clicked, it would generate a
> pageview of a local File: page (for Commons images, usually a "dummy"
> local page). On some projects, it would instead go to the
> corresponding Commons file page.
>
> However, the use of mediaviewer means that a significant fraction of
> clicks on images will not lead to a new pageview; the user is
> satisfied with the lightbox, closes it in place, and stays on the
> page.
>
> In the eswiki case, this seems to be a very convincing explanation for
> the Commons drop. As a project which has not allowed local uploads for
> a long time, I believe any image links went straight to Commons rather
> than to the local File page used on enwiki.
>
> Which leads to an obvious question - on other projects, such as enwiki
> or frwiki, have we accounted for a drop in *file page* views?  What do
> overall pageview numbers look like using, say, just mainspace/ns0?
>

I like the explanation.  More work would probably have to be done to prove
it, but it sounds good.  And it illustrates the point that fewer pageviews
is not always a bad thing!
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

Reply via email to