Woo!  Bike sheds.  So.

There is no namespace table, and so the namespace is not an id.


So, I'm not sure that is necessary for the term "identifier" which I assume
that "id" abbreviates.  Regardless it seems clear that these numbers are
thought of as primary identifiers of a namespace that can otherwise have
many names.  For example, see this snippet from the result of this query:
http://es.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&meta=siteinfo&siprop=namespaces|namespacealiases&format=jsonfm

"1": {
                "id": 1,
                "case": "first-letter",
                "*": "Discusi\u00f3n",
                "subpages": "",
                "canonical": "Talk"

},

Yay more names!

Veteran researchers can rid themselves of the pain of old names, but new
> researchers shouldn't have to deal with legacy naming.


I don't see us getting rid of legacy naming right now.  I don't see how
adding a new name helps anyone -- veteran or newbie.

However, if we were to develop a mapping of canonical names and pursue that
from here forward, we might be able to move beyond the old names for the
most important data sources in a few of years.   However, I'm skeptical
that we'll ever be able to change any production DB field names.

-Aaron

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Andrew Otto <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oh I would never imply TOO verbose.  I am a verbose kinda guy!
>
>
> On Dec 10, 2014, at 16:20, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Are you suggesting we buck any ugliness of the xml field names and choose
>> the most consistent and elegant ones we can think of?!  :D :D
>>
>
> Are you implying I'm too verbose?  If so - you're right.  And I like how
> you put it.  Yes.  Just because many people have tried it different ways
> doesn't mean they had the liberty to think of good, clear names that make
> researchers happy.  But that's exactly what our mission is here - so let's
> make researchers happy.
> _______________________________________________
> Analytics mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Analytics mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>
>
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

Reply via email to