On 29 December 2014 at 07:04, Quim Gil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> All of those, I note, were imported from Bugzilla with that state, so I >> suspect it's more down to silliness in conversions between BZ states and >> Phab states. >> > > > Not really: > > https://old-bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69397 > https://old-bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69253 > https://old-bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69252 >
Yes really. "highest-priority enhancement" == "it is critical that we should add this but it is additional functionality, not a fix to active breakage", not "if we do not add this immediately, everyone will start bleeding from the eyes, so fixing this should be next on the to-do". It's not equivalent to "something is broken and needs unbreaking now": I assume that the BZ conversion just looked at priorities rather than ticket classes. > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > > -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
