Thank you, Nuria! That number is higher than I expected given that the general web was apparently closer to 1.3% in 2010 <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9478737/browser-statistics-on-javascript-disabled>. Do you think there are ways to fine-tune this, perhaps by excluding clients that also didn't download images?
Finally, is there a way to gauge the difference in JS support between anonymous & authenticated users from this data? Gabriel On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]> wrote: > Gabriel: > > I have run through the data and have a rough estimate of how many of our > pageviews are requested from browsers w/o strong javascript support. It is > a preliminary rough estimate but I think is pretty useful. > > TL;DR > According to our new pageview definition ( > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Page_view) about 10% of > pageviews come from clients w/o much javascript support. But - BIG CAVEAT- > this includes bots requests. If you remove the easy-too-spot-big-bots the > percentage is <3%. > > Details here (still some homework to do regarding IE6 and IE7) > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Analytics/Reports/ClientsWithoutJavascript > > > Thanks, > > Nuria >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
