Sorry - this is my bad for not tying these threads together. I saw that Dan suggested we replace vanadium at the same time we move the master. I've been concerned about EL capacity for a while now and it seemed like a good chance to take some downtime and fix both issues.
At the very least we should co-ordinate the process. What do we need to do this? > On Feb 21, 2015, at 16:59, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Looks like Ori is working on replacing vanadium. > There is a ticket created to that effect: > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90363 > > However, I am not sure the best way to proceed forward is to change two > things at the same time (the db and vanadium). > But since that is purely and ops tasks you guys know what's best. > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Sean Pringle <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > It seems to me that we should do the Vanadium hardware upgrade at the same >> > time, if we're going to have down time anyway. Can we bring the new >> > beefier >> > box online? Last time I talked to Ori I understood such a box was already >> > set aside for this by ops. >> >> Oooh I didn't (and don't) know about this. Fair enough; one chunk of >> scheduled downtime is fine with me, though I don't know how long it >> will need to be if we include vanadium. If we do only the database >> split it will be five minutes. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Analytics mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
