I've updated https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90606.

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Bernd Sitzmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sounds good to me.
> On Mar 10, 2015 5:58 PM, "Adam Baso" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> wprov didn't seem to show up as a parameter in looking at the query field
>> on an hour of logs on en.m.wikipedia.org via Hadoop, so I think we're
>> okay there.
>>
>> As for that additional data point, that's a good idea. Bernd, Dmitry, how
>> about we do: sfi (image) and sft (text) ?
>>
>> -Adam
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Dario Taraborelli <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 10, 2015, at 11:26 AM, Adam Baso <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> We're going to use the following format:
>>>
>>> ?wprov=<3_char_feature><platform_one_char><major_version_of_feature_uint>
>>>
>>> For the first version on iOS, this will be
>>>
>>> ?wprov=safi1
>>>
>>> And Android:
>>> ?wprov=safa1
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the closing the loop on this. Dan, Adam – have you guys
>>> considered tagging the type of “share”? I expect “image shares” will have
>>> higher engagement/click-through than “text shares”, if that’s a data point
>>> you want to collect explicitly, you’ll want to pass a different value to
>>> 3_char_feature (assuming that’s possible).
>>>
>>> Is the new parameter going to be in the next beta build?
>>>
>>> Dario
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Adam Baso <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Okay, we'll plan on wprov.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Dan Garry <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Works for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4 March 2015 at 12:33, Adam Baso <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> How about 'wprov'?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Dan Garry <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd really rather this be either something that's totally not
>>>>>>> understandable by the user (e.g. ?saf=1), or something that is clearly
>>>>>>> understandable (e.g. ?appshareafact=1).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4 March 2015 at 12:26, Adam Baso <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ha! I'm cool with 'provenance' if no one objects.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Andrew Otto <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oof, only that it is ugly! :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you just call it ‘provenance', or are you trying to be more
>>>>>>>>> future proof?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 4, 2015, at 12:11, Adam Baso <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I pinged on Phabricator at
>>>>>>>>> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90606 about modeling after
>>>>>>>>> that patch. That sort of approach should avoid cache fragmentation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As for parameter name, 'wmfxan' is short and I think would avoid
>>>>>>>>> collisions. Any problems with this parameter name?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Adam
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ping ... (regarding cache question)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Gergo Tisza <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. What about caching?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is this page:*
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://wikipedia.org/BarackObama?some_param=some-value
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://wikipedia.org/BarackObama?some_param=some-value>*
>>>>>>>>>>>> being served from the cache as it should be?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The file download parameter was handled via this patch:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/120617/
>>>>>>>>>>> Seems like an analogous scenario.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Analytics mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Analytics mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Analytics mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dan Garry
>>>>>>> Associate Product Manager, Mobile Apps
>>>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Analytics mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Analytics mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dan Garry
>>>>> Associate Product Manager, Mobile Apps
>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Analytics mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Analytics mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Analytics mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

Reply via email to