>I've restructured the Wiki page in a way which is easier to understand from my POV.Please check if it's still correct. Looks good, thank you for doing the changes.
>RE:stat1002. I've never used it before. I've only used stat1003 to verify event logging using zsub. I never used 1003 as I do not think I have permits there. The same set of logs for EL present in the beta cluster are available (for production data) in 1002 at a given location for some months. Please take a look: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stat1002 On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Bernd Sitzmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Nuria, > > I've restructured the Wiki page in a way which is easier to understand > from my POV. > Please check if it's still correct. The part I still was a bit confused > about is > https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/EventLogging/Testing/BetaLabs#Raw_stream_of_events_.28including_unvalidated_events.29 > > If events do not appear they might not be valid, check /var/log/upstart/ for >> either the server-side or the client-side processor logs. Validation errors >> will appear on those logs and they are very descriptive. > > > I don't think this is correct but I don't know which files you are > actually talking about, how to verify event validation. > > > RE:stat1002. I've never used it before. I've only used stat1003 to verify > event logging using zsub. Maybe you or someone else could show me sometimes > how to actually verify event logging in production? > > Thanks, > Bernd > >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
