Gonna stop this ISO date fancy bandwagon right here :) We could do it with a bunch of VCL code but that affects performance of the site and we'd rather take the hit in analytics. We could look into making a UDF that deals with this and other common date code we'd want to DRY.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for ISO dates. They're also more parsable by researchers. > > On 27 April 2015 at 18:57, Dario Taraborelli <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I also noticed the cookie stores a string with a 3-letter month > (27-Apr-2015), any reason not to use a shorter ISO date instead > (2015-04-27)? > > > >> On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Marcel Ruiz Forns <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> +1 'last' > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Analytics mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Analytics mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > > > > -- > Oliver Keyes > Research Analyst > Wikimedia Foundation > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
