Indeed, but next step != explicit deliverables. Kevin, could you put together a meeting to work out what's specifically being asked for here? Then Dan can prioritise and schedule it as part of the standard process.
On 27 May 2015 at 17:04, Tomasz Finc <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm sort of shocked to hear "we're supposed to be presenting this data >> at the next metrics meeting": in the future if there are instances >> where data is going to be up for public scrutiny, would it be possible >> to explicitly associate time for that? My goal is to get us to the >> point where our data is reliable all, or at least, most of the time, >> and for a fragment of one person's time over two weeks, I think >> progress on that is pretty fantastic. But prepping data for that kind >> of event does change the priorities and what tasks should be worked >> on. >> >> If we want to present data, generally speaking, let's discuss what we >> can show off. If we want to present the dashboards I'll put my all >> into making the data at least something where we know the >> deficiencies, if not something where we consider the deficiencies >> tolerable. > > This was brought up as a next step during a number of discussions > between the team before I left. Let's focus on what it would take and > work with the team to do it. I don't want to present data we have no > confidence in but we need to start showcasing the stories that were > learning and pushing search forward for our users. > > Thank you for your work on this Oliver > > --tomasz > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-search-private mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-search-private -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
