Yep, the Zero tag would be very useful. Also, something zero team found highly useful are: via (proxy value in x-analytics), https vs http, zero sub domain vs m subdomain. On Jun 5, 2015 14:51, "Kevin Leduc" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I came across another potential requirement from the WP Zero team: > add the x-analytics['zero'] to the dimensions. This would allow the zero > team to get pageviews per partner carrier. Our partners are interested in > this data, however, they don't want to share it with anyone as it is > competitive data, and we can't make it public. > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Jon Katz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Dan, and apologies if these are naive questions: >> >> For mobile web can we also see beta v. stable? This is important for >> tracking prototypes, which is one of the core product uses for this data. >> >> For apps can we see ios v android? >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 5 June 2015 at 10:38, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> Gotcha. Reading that proposal it appears to be a proposal for a >>> >> methodology that will enable future proposals; where are the future >>> >> proposals? >>> > >>> > >>> > Well, so the geo cube has to guess a bit at who would find it useful >>> in the >>> > future. >>> > >>> >> >>> >> It also says "in many countries, disease monitoring must be >>> >> carried out at the state or metro-area level" - which countries have >>> >> to be metro-level? Who are we risking the entire reader population >>> >> for, here? Is it one country, or ten, or? >>> >> >>> >> For what it's worth I love the idea of this kind of live stream. But I >>> >> want to make sure that how the various chunks are being prioritised, >>> >> and how critical they are to the outside world, is correlated - and is >>> >> correlated with the underlying data's sensitivity, at that. If we're >>> >> introducing risks by going down to city level and the actual use cases >>> >> for city level data are limited, let's not do that - but this proposal >>> >> doesn't provide thoughts on how limited those use cases are. It just >>> >> says that it's required in some countries. >>> > >>> > >>> > I agree with you, but I'm not sure the data is risky if it's >>> k-anonymous. >>> > Most likely, just doing that will limit the countries for which metro >>> level >>> > data is available. >>> >>> I don't think it is if it is! As you said, though, we need to hammer >>> on it for a while to make absolutely sure it's okay, and using >>> lower-resolution data would not only make this easier but also reduce >>> the cost of getting people wrong (geolocating people to MA is less >>> dangerous than geolocating them to Arlington) >>> >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Analytics mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Oliver Keyes >>> Research Analyst >>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Analytics mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Analytics mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
