Remember that (as things currently stand) putting the thing on labs
means meta-analytics ("how are the cubes being used?") being a pain in
the backside to integrate with our existing storage solutions.On 8 June 2015 at 22:52, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]> wrote: >> As always, I'd recommend that we go with tech we are familiar with -- >> mysql or cassandra. We have a cassandra committer on staff who would be able >> to answer these questions in detail. >> >> >> WMF uses PostGRES for some things, no? Or is that is just in labs? > > > Since this data is meant to be fully public and queryable in any way, we > could put it in the PostgreSQL instance on labs. We should check with labs > folks, perhaps horse trade some hardware, but I think that would be a > splendid solution. > > However, and I'm trying to understate this in case people are not familiar > with my hyperbolic style, I'd rather drink Bud Lite Lime than use MySQL for > this. MySQL is suited for a lot of things, but analytics is not one of > them. > > p.s. I will never drink Bud Lite Lime. Like, never. > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
