You can also contact the tool maintainers on enwp10 to find out about how they score it - the details are listed here - http://tools.wmflabs.org/.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think I've ever seen that scoring tool before; it's certainly not > run by WMF analytics. I would imagine it's producing that result because it > is going off the article quality, which hasn't been set for that content, > but that's basically idle speculation. > > On 15 January 2016 at 01:31, Anders Neld <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would be grateful to know why the unassessed Wikipedia article *Emelie >> Forsberg* hos a score of 0 when the grok statistics say that it has been >> viewed in excess of 3,000 times in 90 days. Doesn't the hitcount data for >> used for calculating the score use the same data? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> With best regards, >> -- >> Anders Neld >> Sveavägen 59 >> SE-182 62 Djursholm >> Sweden >> [email protected] >> Home: +46 8 755 74 25 >> Mobile: +46 70 66 66 120 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Analytics mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >> >> > > > -- > Oliver Keyes > Count Logula > Wikimedia Foundation > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > > -- --Madhu :)
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
