Hello everyone, The results of the survey have now been published, canonically on LessWrong: http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/nru/wikipedia_usage_survey_results/
I have also updated the project page, https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_usage_survey , to mark it as complete. Best, Issa On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Issa Rice <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is Issa Rice, the friend mentioned in Vipul's original email. > > > who is "we" in your email? > > The "we" is "Vipul and Issa". > > > How and under which license will your results be published? > > The final venue for the results is still undecided. The license for the > results will be CC0. > > Also, as suggested by Jonathan, we added this page: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_usage_survey > > Best, > Issa > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Jonathan Morgan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Vipul, >> >> I anticipate that you will have to field additional questions about who >> you are, the purpose of your research, your methods, and your data >> collection and usage practices. To anticipate these questions, I strongly >> suggest that you create a page for your project in our research repository: >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Projects#Add_your_project >> >> Best, >> Jonathan >> >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Andre Klapper <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Vipul, >>> >>> who is "we" in your email? >>> How and under which license will your results be published? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> andre >>> >>> On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 22:35 -0700, Vipul Naik wrote: >>> > The short answer is that we ultimately want to get a better sense of >>> > the value of a Wikipedia pageview (one way to measure the impact of >>> > content creation), and one way to do this is to understand how people >>> > are using Wikipedia. We're working on creating Wikipedia content (and >>> > encouraging others to do so) and in order to identify the best >>> > content to create, we'd like to better understand what the metrics >>> > involved mean. >>> > >>> > Wikipedia allows relatively easy access to pageview data, and there >>> > are some surveys that provide demographic data. However, after >>> > looking around, it appeared that the kind of information our survey >>> > was designed to find was not available. The two surveys we found >>> > (that we found interesting but didn't cover the questions we were >>> > interested in) were https://web.archive.org/web/20130717211630/http:/ >>> > /wikipediastudy.org/ and https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commo >>> > ns/8/8a/Global_South_User_Survey_2014_-_Full_Analysis_Report.pdf. >>> > >>> > Finally, there is just plain curiosity that makes us wonder how >>> > people are using Wikipedia. >>> > >>> > Vipul >>> > >>> > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki@gmai >>> > l.com> wrote: >>> > > Vipul Naik, 31/05/2016 02:51: >>> > > > Any feedback on the survey questions would also be appreciated, >>> > > > on- or >>> > > > off-thread. >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > You should specify what the data will be used for. >>> > > >>> > > Nemo >>> >>> -- >>> Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler >>> http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Analytics mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jonathan T. Morgan >> Senior Design Researcher >> Wikimedia Foundation >> User:Jmorgan (WMF) <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jmorgan_(WMF)> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
