Would it not make more sense for the team / teams that maintain statd & graphite to maintain statv?
As far as I see statsv is part of that ecosystem and also as far as I know the analytics team doesn't really have much to do with it. On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 at 10:40 Gilles Dubuc <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > With Ori not responsible for statsv maintenance in an official capacity, > should the Analytics team handle statsv maintenance going forward? > > Ori has tried to leave it in a state that doesn't need much maintenance > (read: restarts in case of issues) and is still trying to make it do so > <https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/321230/2>. Which means that it > shouldn't require that much actual work other than keeping an eye on it and > kicking it if the things Ori has been trying to put in place don't work. > > Given that we're not the only ones using statsv and considering its > function, analytics seems like the home it should get. What do you think? > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
