>Surely this can't be accurate though as most other sites on the internet report virtually non-existent usage of IE7 (less than 1% everywhere I've checked). Can someone >double-check this? This is likely bot traffic with IE7 user-agent. See: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T148461
We will hopefully be able to tackle distortion of stats by non-labelled bot traffic in the next year: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T138207 Issue for dataset noted here: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Analytics/Data_Lake/Traffic/Browser_general#Changes_and_known_problems_since_2016-03-21 On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Ryan Kaldari <[email protected]> wrote: > According to... > https://analytics.wikimedia.org/dashboards/browsers/#all- > sites-by-browser/browser-family-and-major-hierarchical-view > ... IE7 accounts for 2.5% of all pageviews in the last month. > > According to... > https://analytics.wikimedia.org/dashboards/browsers/# > desktop-site-by-browser/browser-family-and-major-hierarchical-view > ... IE7 accounts for 5.1% of all desktop pageviews in the last month. > > If that's true, IE7 (which came out 10 years ago) is more popular than all > versions of Safari combined. It also means that we need to roll back a > whole slew of features in MediaWiki that aren't supported in IE7. > > Surely this can't be accurate though as most other sites on the internet > report virtually non-existent usage of IE7 (less than 1% everywhere I've > checked). Can someone double-check this? > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
