Maybe this doc will help? https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Analytics/Archive/Data/Pagecounts-all-sites#Disambiguating_abbreviations_ending_in_.E2.80.9C.m.E2.80.9D
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Michael Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Federico. > > In the docs you referenced, I can't find any reference to "en.m" that > contrasts with the "en.z". This page > <https://archive.org/details/wikipedia_visitor_stats&tab=about> describes > codes, but they're different from the ones in pagecounts-ez > <https://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-ez/>. > > I've noticed the "en.m" lines only started appearing in Dec 2015. > > I'm just trying to understand, if I want the most accurate pagecounts over > time, should I be including the "en.m" lines on top of "en.z", or are they > something different? > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Michael Baldwin, 14/11/2017 04:43: >> >>> However, I've been coming across a large number of wiki codes "en.m". >>> The "m" code is undocumented. It appears to be the mobile version of >>> Wikipedia, but can anyone confirm that? Should the page be updated with >>> this information? >>> >> >> Historically we collect most docs here: >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Killiondude/stats> >> <https://archive.org/details/wikipedia_visitor_stats&tab=about> >> >> Federico >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
