Thanks. On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >Thanks, good to know - is there a report around that? I'm wondering how > "missing requests" ought to be expressed with some margin of error. > I think the ones that can quantify this best is your team. If anything > from what I remember from pop ups experiments the inflow of events was > higher than expected calculations. Overall usage of DNT for FF users was > about ~10% last time we looked at it, overall usage on our userbase is > quite a bit smaller I bet. > > https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2013/05/03/mozillas- > new-do-not-track-dashboard-firefox-users-continue-to- > seek-out-and-enable-dnt/ > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Adam Baso <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >Thanks, Sam. Nuria, that's what I was getting at - if using the EL JS >>> library would some sort of new method be needed so that these impressions >>> arena't undercounted? >>> If we had a lot of users with DNT, maybe, from our tests when we enabled >>> that on EL this is not the case. >>> >> >> Thanks, good to know - is there a report around that? I'm wondering how >> "missing requests" ought to be expressed with some margin of error. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Analytics mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
