[Leia, thanks for binding to initial thread.] I used suggested tool at the approximately top ten the most visited pages at Czech Wikipedia. The result <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QSC5-zgD8SXVAUVa0O93rrDix9tuv8AWhBgSC9ts-_A/edit?usp=sharing> is interesting. The ratio between visitors of the page and corresponding discussion is huge. It's under distinctive ability of the advertising agencies (CPI <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_per_impression> per week). As seems MediaWiki is resistant against embedded ads based on user names by design. Good news, I think.
Wikidata. My question "Wikidata Query and Wikipedia statistics/meta informations" and responses were deleted by the bot <https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata%3ARequest_a_query&diff=prev&oldid=696548052>. Lada ;? On 2018-06-12 20:18, Leila Zia wrote: > [coming back from a private response to the public list, with > Ladislav's permission.] > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:03 AM Ladislav Nešněra > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Re: to https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/analytics/2018-May/006349.html >> >> Hi Leila, >> I'm sorry for the delay but I'm not subscriber of this forum and >> registration doesn't work for me :-O >> (https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics). It means - I had >> no signal about your answer. > No worries. I understand you're in now. :) > >> Yes, I'd like to know something about user behaviour. This paragraph limits >> user names based on potential abuse for promotional purpose. Would be fine >> to know how many users reach the pages where they can see user names >> (=discussion + history of the article + history of the discussion). Ideally >> separate human readers and editors. Is it possible? > There is no immediate data available I can think of to point you, too > (others should feel free, of course, to provide pointers): > > * If you're interested in anecdotal evidence: The easiest way I can > think of that you can visually see this information would be using > pageviews analysis tool [1]. > * A properly set-up analysis will need to look at the pageviews to the > destinations you mentioned before/after the change, controlling for > seasonality, pageview changes over time, etc. > * Separating editor pageviews vs. reader pageviews will be hard and > that's by design. Even if we can set aside time to run this analysis > for you, this can only be done over the data in the past 90 days (at > most) and I would need to see a relatively strong editor community > support for doing it. (We generally don't do in-depth analysis of what > editors read, so some discussion is needed to make that happen.) > * If you decide to pursue the above, please communicate the priority > of this question on your end to help us prioritize. For example, is > there a community discussion pending on this result? How important is > that discussion? etc. > >> And one related question - Wikidata Query and Wikipedia statistics. > [Link: > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Request_a_query#Wikidata_Query_and_Wikipedia_statistics/meta_informations] > > I'll let others who know more answer the question above, my guess > would be what's already said in the link above. > > Best, > Leila > >> Thank you in advance for your time ;? > > [1] > http://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-20&pages=Cat|Dog > >> >> On 2018-05-29 00:59, Ladislav Nešněra wrote: >> >> Dear analytic team ;), >> >> I'd like to know if the policy about promotional user names solve real >> problem or if this problem was only anticipated in 2007. >> Is it possible to get statistic which distinguish between article visitors >> and people which can see potential promotion names i.e. discussion + history >> of the article + history of discussion? It'd by ideal exclude editors (it's >> hard to influence a persons familiar with the subject contrariwise they've >> be annoyed by promoting) but I don't believe it would be a significant >> difference. >> Can you help me or can you direct me into the right way, please? >> >> Thank you in advance for your time >> >> Ladislav Nešněra ;? >> +420 721 658 256 >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
