This seems a start towards way to message "community health" that anyone can grasp: https://meta.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Health_rating_radio_button_template_on_talk_pages
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 4:10 AM ABEL SERRANO JUSTE <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for opening the discussion. In our research group > <https://grasia.fdi.ucm.es/newmain/language/en/>, we are working > specifically on this. > > You can get a lot of good ideas and pointers to other research from the > Wikimedia > research page <https://research.wikimedia.org/community-health.html> and > from the last Inspire Campaign of Wikimedia, which it was precisely about > Measuring editing community health: > https://meta.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Inspire > > Thank you also Marc for sharing your ideas, they are very interesting. We > have already been working with inequality metrics > <http://www.opensym.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/OpenSym2018_paper_31-1.pdf> > . > > El vie., 19 oct. 2018 a las 16:35, Marc Miquel (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > >> Hi Joe, >> >> I think this project is fundamental. I'm glad you are working on it. >> >> I have researched this topic in my PhD thesis and I went through a review >> of the online communities engagement literature. >> >> Few ideas for metrics: >> - Contributions inequality measurements (gini coefficients as a start). >> - Multilingual editors contributions (to see whether they see Wikipedia >> as a global project or prefer to focus on one language). >> - Core-periphery social interactions (admins-newbees, in order to detect >> communities more prone to mentoring) >> - Rate of newbies completing the first article, rate of newbies >> completing the first translation, etc. >> - Recency measures for newbies (different measures on editor retention). >> - Community/functional roles renewal (admin, autopatrolled, etc. to see >> how good a community is at renewing its core along the years). >> >> I'd be happy to further discuss the topic. At your disposal. >> Best regards, >> >> Marc Miquel >> >> >> El dv., 5 d’oct. 2018 a les 23:29, Joe Sutherland (< >> [email protected]>) va escriure: >> >>> Hello everyone - apologies for cross-posting! *TL;DR*: We would like >>> your feedback on our Metrics Kit project. Please have a look and comment on >>> Meta-Wiki: >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_health_initiative/Metrics_kit >>> >>> >>> The Wikimedia Foundation's Trust and Safety team, in collaboration with >>> the Community Health Initiative, is working on a Metrics Kit designed to >>> measure the relative "health"[1] of various communities that make up the >>> Wikimedia movement: >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_health_initiative/Metrics_kit >>> >>> The ultimate outcome will be a public suite of statistics and data >>> looking at various aspects of Wikimedia project communities. This could be >>> used by both community members to make decisions on their community >>> direction and Wikimedia Foundation staff to point anti-harassment tool >>> development in the right direction. >>> >>> We have a set of metrics we are thinking about including in the kit, >>> ranging from the ratio of active users to active administrators, >>> administrator confidence levels, and off-wiki factors such as freedom to >>> participate. It's ambitious, and our methods of collecting such data will >>> vary. >>> >>> Right now, we'd like to know: >>> * Which metrics make sense to collect? Which don't? What are we missing? >>> * Where would such a tool ideally be hosted? Where would you normally >>> look for statistics like these? >>> * We are aware of the overlap in scope between this and Wikistats < >>> https://stats.wikimedia.org/v2/#/all-projects> — how might these tools >>> coexist? >>> >>> Your opinions will help to guide this project going forward. We'll be >>> reaching out at different stages of this project, so if you're interested >>> in direct messaging going forward, please feel free to indicate your >>> interest by signing up on the consultation page. >>> >>> Looking forward to reading your thoughts. >>> >>> best, >>> Joe >>> >>> P.S.: Please feel free to CC me in conversations that might happen on >>> this list! >>> >>> [1] What do we mean by "health"? There is no standard definition of what >>> makes a Wikimedia community "healthy", but there are many indicators that >>> highlight where a wiki is doing well, and where it could improve. This >>> project aims to provide a variety of useful data points that will inform >>> community decisions that will benefit from objective data. >>> >>> -- >>> *Joe Sutherland* (he/him or they/them) >>> Trust and Safety Specialist >>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> joesutherland.rocks >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Analytics mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Analytics mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >> > -- > Saludos, > Abel. > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
