Just a friendly reminder, that the research showcase on censorship will
take place later today at 17:00 UTC (9:00AM PST/18:00PM CET).
Livestream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z52wPt34rJc

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 7:21 PM Martin Gerlach <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The next Research Showcase will be live-streamed on Wednesday, February
> 17, at 9:00 AM PST/17:00 UTC (Note that this is 30 minutes earlier than the
> usual time).  This month’s showcase will be around the topic of censorship
> (of Wikipedia). In the first talk, Daniel Romero presents a study examining
> the effect of censorship on the collaborative behavior of editors. In the
> second talk, Margaret Roberts presents work on disaggregating the effects
> of censorship on proactive vs incidental consumption of information.
>
> Youtube stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z52wPt34rJc
>
> As usual, you can join the conversation on IRC at #wikimedia-research. You
> can also watch our past research showcases here:
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Research/Showcase
>
>
> Talk 1:
>
> Speaker: Daniel Romero (University of Michigan)
>
> Title: Shocking the Crowd: The Effect of Censorship Shocks on Chinese
> Wikipedia
>
> Abstract: Collaborative crowdsourcing has become a popular approach to
> organizing work across the globe. Being global also means being vulnerable
> to shocks – unforeseen events that disrupt crowds – that originate from any
> country. In this study, we examine changes in collaborative behavior of
> editors of Chinese Wikipedia that arise due to the 2005 government
> censorship in mainland China. Using the exogenous variation in the fraction
> of editors blocked across different articles due to the censorship, we
> examine the impact of reduction in group size, which we denote as the shock
> level, on three collaborative behavior measures: volume of activity,
> centralization, and conflict. We find that activity and conflict drop on
> articles that face a shock, whereas centralization increases. The impact of
> a shock on activity increases with shock level, whereas the impact on
> centralization and conflict is higher for moderate shock levels than for
> very small or very high shock levels. These findings provide support for
> threat rigidity theory – originally introduced in the organizational theory
> literature – in the context of large-scale collaborative crowds.
>
> Talk 2
>
> Speaker: Margaret Roberts (University of California San Diego)
>
> Title: Censorship's Effect on Incidental Exposure to Information:
> Evidence from Wikipedia
> Abstract: The fast-growing body of research on internet censorship has
> examined the effects of censoring selective pieces of political information
> and the unintended consequences of censorship of entertainment. However, we
> know very little about the broader consequences of coarse censorship or
> censorship that affects a large array of information such as an entire
> website or search engine. In this study, we use China’s complete block of
> Chinese language Wikipedia (zh.wikipedia.org) on May 19, 2015, to
> disaggregate the effects of coarse censorship on proactive consumption of
> information—information users seek out—and on incidental consumption of
> information—information users are not actively seeking but consume when
> they happen to come across it. We quantify the effects of censorship of
> Wikipedia not only on proactive information consumption but also on
> opportunities for exploration and incidental consumption of information. We
> find that users from mainland China were much more likely to consume
> information on Wikipedia about politics and history incidentally rather
> than proactively, suggesting that the effects of censorship on incidental
> information access may be politically significant.
>
>
> --
> Martin Gerlach
> Research Scientist
> Wikimedia Foundation
>


-- 
Martin Gerlach
Research Scientist
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

Reply via email to