I have a basic understanding of classical Hebrew, and found that looking at 
other semitic literature has helped to further this understanding. For 
instance, we are looking at the Hebrew Tanakh through western eyes in which we 
look at the written text as the primary source of knowledge, when in reality 
the text is secondary to a recitation or oral understanding. The Qur'an is the 
same way in this respect. There are several ways to recite the Qur'an, and all 
ways are considered to be correct (the two major recitations are the Warsh and 
Hafs). The Hebrew Text is in a way a short hand to help one remember what one 
needs to recite without being taught the recitation the short hand can become 
ambiguous. The word MLK can mean either Molek (the pagan god) or king, the 
recitation that one is taught can help one remember which word is appropriate 
in the verse. What is interesting is that there are times in which the 
Septuagint seems to have a different recitation from the Masorah in which the 
difference in meaning is not a difference so much in words as in vowel 
points.So essencially the vowel pointing was to try to convey the reciation 
that was the primary source. These were texts to be sung and memorized the 
writing down was secondary.

--- In [email protected], [email protected] 
wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "hebrewsister" <hebrewsister@> wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering how necessary is it to know the vowel marks under the 
> > letters if it is a new thing?  
> > 
> > Is it possible to learn to read Hebrew without them?  I mean, How did they 
> > learn it before?
> > 
> > Bayadwa
> >
> All the answers given are some what factual, however, the "vowel" marks did 
> not exist until about the 9th century AD and were added to use the Text as a 
> spoken language. 
> 
> The Text, as we see in the "dead Sea Scrolls" did not have these "marks".
> 
> The "ancient-hebrew" text was originally in "PICTURES" which did not need 
> "VOWEL" marks.
> 
> So I find these marks to be somewhat distracting and even sometimes 
> misleading.
> 
> The Text was meant to be seen (Read) and not Just Read out loud. 
> 
> Rich
> AHRC
>


Reply via email to