Shabbat Shalom! שבת  שלום
 
Thank you very much!

Eliora Bat-Tziyon  אליאורה בת-ציון    
קָדושׁ קָדושׁ קָדושׁ יהוה צְבָאות מְלא כָל־הָארֶץ כְּבודו
                                               אֲנִי לְדודִי וְדודִי לִי 
                             אליאורה בת-ציון  קדֶשׁה ליהוה                  
Isaiah 6:3,  The Ultimate Song 6:3,  Exodus 28:36 (1 Peter 2:9)   
"They preached with joyful urgency that life can be radically different... "
Mark 6:12 MSG 
http://www.cafemom.com/home/EileenMomGranny
http://www.myspace.com/eileen_mom_granny         
http://www.livinginblackandwhite.com/profile/ElioraBatTziyon




________________________________
From: cohenizzy <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, July 9, 2010 12:54:24 PM
Subject: [ancient_hebrew] Re: Ancient Ayin and Aleph pronunciation?

  
Eliora asked: 
> what are the original sounds of Aleph and Ayin? 
Aiyin
It is generally accepted that the aiyin (written below as 3) had a velar 
G/K-sound as in 3aZa = Gaza. 

I find that words containing an aiyin are sometimes cognate with Greek and 
Latin 
words containing a hard CR-sound. For example, 3oFaL (Ophal, the high fortified 
area at the southern end of the Temple  mount) seems to be cognate with Greek 
acropolis =  high (fortified area) of the city.
BTW, the Hebrew word 3aiYiN =  eye also means color. That is 
"What eye?" = "What color?". Treating the 3 in 3aiYiN = color as CR produces 
"crayon". Compare the standard etymology for crayon from Latin  creta = chalk 
(which is usually white).
Aleph
I think the aleph originally had a northern GHT and Mediterranean CHS-sound. 
You 
can hear a similar sound in German words containing CHT, such as Licht = light, 
Nacht = night, and Macht = might (strength).
Evidence for this original sound is contained in 
        1. ancient toponyms (place names) 
        2. Rashi script 
        3. current Hebrew words where het+shin seems to have replaced an aleph 
in order 
to retain the original sound. 

        4. cognates where aleph is parallel to GHT/CHT in Germanic languages.
 
        1. The area now called (the) Ukraine had been known as Roxolania and 
later as 
Rus (south of Belarus = White Russia). Compare R CHS Slania and RuS with 
resh-aleph-shin = head. Then compare Ukraina with Greek kranion = skull, 
cranium.
(I do not agree with the opinion that Ukraina is derived from Slavic u kraina = 
at/to the border.)

        2. The Rashi-script aleph looks like a het + chupchik. The Rashi-script 
shin 
looks like a tet turned 90 degrees clockwise. The modern hand-written shin 
looks 
like a closed tet. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashi_script    or
http://www.hebrew4c hristians. com/Grammar/ Unit_One/ Rashi_Script/ 
Summary/summary. html

        3. MakHSHeV = computer and kHeSHBoN = bill, account are based on the 
root 
het-shin-bet. This root has the meanings "to think" (in a logical sequence) and 
"to count" (1, 2, ...) ... that is, to aleph-bet something.

kHaSHMaL = electricity occurs in Tanakh only in Ezekiel with the meaning "color 
of amber". In many languages, the concept "electricity" is derived from amber 
(which evidences static electricity) . This word is sometimes translated as 
Latin electrum, an alloy of gold and silver with the same color. If you replace 
the het+shin with an aleph whose sound is lost and replace the mem with an 
MB-sound, kHaSHMaL sounds like ambal or amber.


        4. The second word in Tanakh, bet-resh-aleph = created, seems to be 
cognate 
with BRouGHT (forth). LiGHTS (OE for lungs) seems cognate with resh-aleph-oh- 
sof = lungs.  
In many Hebrew words, the aleph seems to have moved to the beginning of the 
word 
after it lost its sound. If the aleph is moved back to the end of the word, 
aleph-oh-resh = light (radiation) seems cognate with LiGHT.
Giving the shin its earlier D/T-sound (see 2 above), aleph-shin-heh =wife seems 
cognate with DauGHTer. Among the ancient Hebrews, the wife went to live with 
the 
tribe of her husband. For her husband, she was a wife. For everyone else she 
was 
like another daughter.
Ciao, Izzy
 

Reply via email to