www.geonames.org
On Mar 24, 8:28 am, kelvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I can gather (from my own experimentation and from this
> threadhttp://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_thread/threa...),
> the reverse geocoder functionality is currently mocked up, with a
> handful of hard-coded addresses.
>
> I understand that this is probably be worked on, but I'm curious as to
> how this is going to be treated as far as judging the ADC. With my
> group's submission this functionality plays a fairly large role, and
> we are concerned that with the crippled state of the geocoder, our
> application may not be viewed in the proper light. Obviously the
> judges would understand the limitations, but we can't help but fear
> that without such a large chunk of the functionality present, our
> entry just won't stand on its own.
>
> Can someone with inside knowledge on the process recommend a course of
> action for us? Will the geocoding functionality be complete in time
> for the judging? Should we be looking into using a third-party
> geocoder? Or should we simulate all the data so that we essentially
> have a demo running on rails?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> -kelvin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
