huuu?!?*#D
On Mar 28, 11:22 pm, "Shane Isbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe the developer that disappeared was flapping his mouth off on the
> android lists too much and otherwise being generally obnoxious, so he never
> got any work done.
>
> Shane
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Why did you lose your Android guy? If I was fortunate enough to get
> > in on a "sure thing" with founders savvy enough to have raised $100mm
> > in past ventures, I would stick around for the remaining two weeks
> > even if I hated everyone on the team.
>
> > I think you'd have a better chance of finding an Android developer by
> > telling everyone on this board what this amazing idea is. Talk is
> > cheap.
>
> > But, I do have an investment for you. I have this cousin in Nigeria
> > who works for the government and is looking to make sovereign wealth
> > VC investments. If you forward me $10,000 as a deposit so I know you
> > are serious I will have my cousin wire you $1mm for as a convertible
> > note to Series A in your venture. Let me know what you think - it's
> > a sure thing.
>
> > On Mar 28, 11:48 am, Team needs Android coder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Thanks Rick for that clarification. The money we've raised in the
> > > past is on other ventures.
>
> > > This is no scam.... we were a four person team (a designer, a CFO/COO
> > > type, a server-side programmer and an android client guy) and we've
> > > lost our android guy.
>
> > > We're forging on regardless of this contest, but I hate to let a good
> > > opportunity go.
>
> > > J
>
> > > On Mar 28, 9:59 am, Alex Pisarev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > sorry, my misreading... :(
>
> > > > On Mar 28, 5:25 pm, Rick Genter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Mar 28, 2008, at 7:22 AM, Alex Pisarev wrote:
>
> > > > > >> We have a pretty serious Android project going designed to turn
> > > > > >> into a
> > > > > >> real company with real revenue and real upside for its founders.
> > > > > >> Between the founders we have raised more than $100 M in venture
> > > > > >> capital for early stage start-ups. There is no doubt we can do
> > it
> > > > > >> again with the right product.
>
> > > > > > Definetely a scam. 100M for early start-up? I would like to see
> > the
> > > > > > VCs who are naive enough to waste such money for early startups.
>
> > > > > > Also, it's quite interesting that the success of such powerful
> > > > > > enterprise is so much related on one Java coder :)
>
> > > > > Though I have no opinion on the original poster, several people are
> > > > > misreading what was originally typed. The OP said that they "have
> > > > > raised more than $100 M in venture capital for early stage
> > start-ups".
> > > > > That doesn't mean that *this* venture has $100 M behind it, only
> > that
> > > > > they've done that in the past.
> > > > > --
> > > > > Rick Genter
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
