i dont know how to latitude and longitude by sending request as location to google.com/glm/mmap server.... If anyone succeeds, please reply...
Thanks Guna On Apr 8, 7:26 am, Ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dan, that doesn't answer my question. > I know that there is no prohibition on using undocumented apis and I > also know undocumented apis can be removed from future SDK builds. > Possible removal of the api in future builds won't impact me. As > mentioned above, I'm only concerned about M5-rc14 and this build does > support GmmGeocoder though it is undocumented. > > However, GmmGeocoder uses google.com/glm/mmap server functionality and > I don't know whether it is safe to count on the server functionality > continuing to work over the next one month. > > Dan U mentioned that he expects the server functionality to continue > working ....and that is what I also think. > However, it is possible that Google could turn off the server > functionality or deny requests from Android simulators. If the server > functionality doesn't work, GmmGeocoder will stop working in M5-rc14. > So it will be nice to get official confirmation on whether the > google.com/glm/mmap server functionality (as required by GmmGeocoder) > will continue to work. > > Thanks Ram > > On Apr 7, 6:45 pm, "Dan Morrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dan is quite correct. We will not be requiring source code to be submitted > > and we won't be monitoring what the applications are doing, so we won't know > > if you are using internal or undocumented APIs. There are no prohibitions > > in the rules against this. > > However, Dan is also correct in that you should be very cautious using > > undocumented APIs, since they are likely to change or even be removed in > > future builds of the SDK. > > > - Dan > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Dan U. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think they are going to say it's not supported, but that doesn't > > > necessarily mean it won't work. I think the glm server is probably > > > used for more than just Android, so I wouldn't expect it to go away, > > > but I could be wrong. > > > > On Apr 7, 1:08 am, Ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, my app will need geocoding functionality and ....so I looked at > > > > geocoding support in Android today. > > > > > I was able to get the mock GeoCoder functionality working. However, > > > > the default geodb data is very limited. > > > > I'm not sure if it is a good idea for me to require judges to adb-push > > > > a new geodb file with additional data. > > > > > I was also able to get the undocumented GmmGeocoder working (I > > > > discovered this class from old posts on the android-dev group). > > > > > Since judges will use M5-rc14 to test apps written with M5- > > > > rc14 ..........and since the GmmGeocoder is supported in M5-rc14, I'm > > > > assuming that it is OK for challenge-submissions to use the > > > > GmmGeocoder class. > > > > However, I'm not sure whether google.com/glm/mmap server > > > > functionality (which GmmGeocoder relies on) will continue to work for > > > > the next one month > > > > > Can Dan (so someone else from google) please confirm that it is OK > > > > for challenge entries to use the GmmGeocoder class. (comments from non- > > > > google devs also welcome) > > > > > Thanks Ram- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
