>>Incognito,

>>Agreed. You are talking sense for a change ;)

You are making me blush! :)

On Apr 25, 10:05 am, "Muthu Ramadoss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Incognito,
>
> Agreed. You are talking sense for a change ;)
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >>Hope the judges do take some time, completely understand the "readme" and
> > >>then give their best in fairly testing and judging the applications. I
> > hope
> > >>the judges are not giving it up after their first try, since there's
> > >>countless number of quality hours spend by the hard working android
> > >>developers all over the world. They deserve better.
>
> > Agree with you, however, let me play devil's advocate, if your
> > application takes too long to understand( i.e. a couple of hours as
> > opposed to just a few minutes) then you will most likely loose a lot
> > of points, in fact, I'll doubt you will win. Why? Because these are
> > mobil apps, and mobil apps are supposed to be simple to understand and
> > use, this is the case even for desktop applications. Even if your
> > application is doing something really complicated behind scenes it
> > should still be really easy for a user to get up and running within a
> > couple of minutes. So if a user cannot get the gist of what your
> > application does and how to use it after reading just a couple of
> > paragraphs from your manual or Read Me file then you've probably
> > already lost.
>
> > On Apr 24, 11:55 pm, "Muthu Ramadoss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Any application that would require the judges to read the docs before
> > > running them is clearly going to be at a disadvantage.
>
> > > Why?
>
> > > The judges are all alone sitting with their laptops, ready to test.
> > Imagine
> > > yourself downloading an apk from the net. It comes with a readme,
> > > fairenough. But now imagine how many things might go wrong, if the
> > > application requires you to read the docs fully and understand it and run
> > > the application all by yourself.
>
> > > I'm not saying this is rocket science, but all am saying is there's a lot
> > of
> > > variables that can screw up the experience.
>
> > > Hope the judges do take some time, completely understand the "readme" and
> > > then give their best in fairly testing and judging the applications. I
> > hope
> > > the judges are not giving it up after their first try, since there's
> > > countless number of quality hours spend by the hard working android
> > > developers all over the world. They deserve better.
>
> > > Good luck on all your submissions.
>
> > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:57 AM, ConAim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I have the same problem.
> > > > I look at the server log (which does log every activity came from the
> > > > clients). But then all I see is, the judges make the connection and
> > > > click on the Ready checkbox and then close it. When I staged clearly
> > > > on the documentation that this online poker game need at least 2
> > > > players join and ready to initiate the game. I'm not sure if the
> > > > Judges does read the documents. :(
>
> > > --
> > > take care,
> > > Muthu Ramadoss.
>
> > >http://mobeegal.in
> > > find stuff closer.
>
> --
> take care,
> Muthu Ramadoss.
>
> http://mobeegal.in
> find stuff closer.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to