Glad we're not diving into Python. Nothing against Python per se, but need to think about setting up the team, and bring everyone upto speed etc.,
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Hong Ji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > __ seems to be the only way to declare a method private. No other way is > mentioned in the book Dive into Python which I am going through. > > On the other hand, it may cause more confusions if it is optional. > > > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Muthu Ramadoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hong, > > > > __ is this optional or mandatory? Do they don't have 'private' keyword > > at all? > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Hong Ji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > While waiting for the GAE account in the recent weeks, I have been > > > reading and learning the Python and also the GAE datastore API. For the > > > application I have in mind, I would rather code the application/business > > > logic level code in Java. > > > > > > Python is at least good for creating web pages. But not all > > > applications heavily use web pages as user interfaces. The example here is > > > that the user can interact with the server through an Android application > > > from a mobile phone. > > > > > > One little point on the code readability, I prefer to use "private" to > > > indicate a method is private instead of the "__" as the starting of the > > > method name. > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Muthu Ramadoss < > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > GAE will be useful to the majority of the developers when it starts > > > > its support for PHP and Java. Until then we wait. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Gothy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, I've got one so I want more :) > > > > > It would be great if ADC winner will get more from GAE for > > > > > free(more > > > > > than standard free account includes) > > > > > But in fact, GAE misses lots of functionality which developers > > > > > need, > > > > > hope it will change to better. > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 29, 10:40 am, "Hong Ji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Consider there are so many client/server Android applications, > > > > > is it a good > > > > > > idea for all the ADC participants to receive the Google App > > > > > Engine account > > > > > > invitations asap or at least to be included in the next 10,000 > > > > > invitations? > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, it will be great to see Java supported on Google App > > > > > Engine (http://code.google.com/appengine/). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > take care, > > > > Muthu Ramadoss. > > > > > > > > http://mobeegal.in > > > > find stuff closer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > take care, > > Muthu Ramadoss. > > > > http://mobeegal.in > > find stuff closer. > > > > > > > > -- take care, Muthu Ramadoss. http://mobeegal.in find stuff closer. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
