As software might have problem of running due to environment setup since the testing was done on development computer. If google could have some notification process for those application which are not able to run or giving error, since everybody submitted the working version as i feel. There are errror which might come for environment , sdk update or so which is stopping from run application. if google could have done the test of the application and inform the contestant that its not running then they could have given the updated version, since this 1st phase is for POC.i don't know how many of us having bad luck of not running applicatio after the submission.
On May 3, 7:28 pm, q2dm1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Agreed. My application has been reviewed 2 times so far for about 2 > minutes each. Nice. > > On May 1, 11:59 pm, everfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I submitted two applications (completely working ones). One requires > > registration and then login, the other requires login with the userid > > and password provided in the readme document (for some security > > reason). > > > In the past couple days, my server logs show some BRIEF accesses to > > the two applications. There are some ones registered and logged in the > > application ONE, but no one login the application TWO (or not login > > successfully, I do not know). > > > It seems to me that whoever judges/tests the applications simply just > > did not read the readme document to get the userid/password to login > > the application TWO to see what the application really about. > > > One thing I am 100% sure is that without login to Application TWO, no > > matter how smart/bright a judge is, s/he will not able to appreciate > > what the two applications are really about. > > > Therefore, my concern is: > > Without knowing the judging process (spot check, or not, etc….), I > > even have not seen (based on my server log) any “judge” has made any > > reasonable judging/testing progress on my two applications yet so > > far. > > > Just want to raise my concern now before it is too late. > > > Winning the final 50 is great, but most people will not. > > However, most people (if not all) will feel calm and be respected if > > their hard-works have been judged/treated fairly and professionally. > > > Suggestion: > > To make judging process OPEN: > > post info about what the judging processes are, and update overall > > status about the judging process daily (etc. spot checking day, detail > > checking day, etc….) > > > To make judging process FAIR: > > Ensure judges have sufficient time to read the documents and run the > > applications to the level sufficient for judging the applications. > > (Without reading the document and without login to an application to > > try it at certain degree, it is definitely not sufficient to judge an > > application). > > > Best > > > Ever- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to android-challenge@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
