- 1st of May, from the same IP address from Spain as on 28th somebody took two images from my website.
Seems to me that you may be on top 100. Repeat business is always a good sign. What do you mean by "took two images"? How do you know that? On May 5, 1:15 pm, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If your first application was tested by for judges and then the second > application was not tested at all my take is that something went > wrong. I find it highly unlikely that if the first was tested by four > judges then they would not test the second one. It might be that your > app simply failed to start, was disqualified for an unknown reason, > submission was unsuccessful, or whatever. You might be able to get > some insight from Dan on this if you are lucky. > > On May 5, 8:31 am, beauforthax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > I decided to share my server's log. > > Maybe it would be useful to clarify situation > > of quality of judging. > > > Well, I submited also 2 client-server apps. > > Each of them has PDF documentation with > > some text and screenshots. > > > First application's log: > > - 25th of April, some judge from USA was > > testing my app for a few minutes; > > he/she run only application on emulator > > and even didn't visit web site which was > > important part of project, > > - 27th of April, some judge from USA was > > testing my app for a few minutes; > > he/she run only application on emulator > > and even didn't visit web site, > > - 28th of April, some judge from USA was > > testing my app for a few minutes; > > he/she run only application on emulator > > and even didn't visit web site, > > - 28th of April, some judge from Spain was > > testing my app for a few minutes; > > he/she run application on emulator > > and VISITED my web site! > > - 1st of May, from the same IP address > > from Spain as on 28th somebody took two images > > from my website. > > > Second application's log: > > - no logs, application ignored > > > To conclude, one of my apps was testsed > > in 62,5% (or maybe less because of not testing > > all functions of app) and second in 0%. > > In first case, maybe my documentation was > > so brilliant and judges didn't need to visit > > app's web site ;) > > Don't have an idea what was wrong with > > second application. > > > I really hope that we will have more details > > about judging process soon. At the moment, > > situation is that judges seems to be ignoring > > competitors in many cases. But, I still believe > > in justice of judges. > > > Regards- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
