I am glad I am not the oldest one in this forum. I read that paper-punch
story in book but I did use PDP-11. And I guess they still in service
somewhere in the world. Nothing changed fundamentally except improved
productivity through Internet and Phone.

On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:16 AM, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> I'm like you guys. I enjoy playing with gadgets a lot. As I was
> growing up this is all I did, take things apart, see how they work and
> then tried to put them together again. The putting together thing
> never worked, I always broke whatever I took apart.
>
> On May 6, 12:42 pm, "Andre.Legendre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Good old time good new times
> > For my concern I start by drawing my own board based on a 6800 chip.
> > From Motorola specs nothing else...
> > We had to load our Operating System and to code using assembly
> > language.
> > First program was a Go Game.It start then to have some specialized
> > newspapers where we found some good information.
> > Then we was able to use some Os names Flex and we got basic...and C
> > language later.
> >
> > No hard disk, no floppy disk : music tape with some modem like system
> > to record and to read....
> >
> > At that time professional side was PDP11 at Digital and some other IBM
> > staff with Huge 5Mo (Yes Mega Bytes) hard disks...
> >
> > Then IBM PC arrived with DOS and then I succed to get Unix on PC (with
> > 64 Ko Memory and floppy disk.
> >
> > etc....
> >
> > And now we work on Android and would like to get somebody to look
> > after or work....
> >
> > But any way we enjoy a lot and we will for a while.
> >
> > Andre
> >
> > On May 6, 7:17 pm, baldmountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Nah, probably about the same age. The TRS80 was my dad's. (He liked
> > > gadgets. :) ) I didn't see anything like a PDP-11 until I was a
> > > teaching assistant in grad school for a machine architecture course.
> > > (I learned PDP-11 assembly language in about 3 days so I could start
> > > correcting homework and work in the lab.) I did my thesis project, (a
> > > Fortran simulation of a fast Raleigh fading communications channel)
> > > using a Commodore 64 connected through a 300 baud modem to a CDC Cyber
> > > mainframe at the University. I was a EE major and didn't really start
> > > programming until I was out of school for a few years. I wanted to be
> > > a Radar engineer but that didn't work out.
> >
> > > And nah, I'm sure I'm not the oldest. Just reminiscing a bit about the
> > > old days. The only thing I feel like I missed out on was not getting
> > > the chance to work on a Lisp Machine...
> >
> > > On May 6, 11:29 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Baldmountain,
> > > > I don't know if you are older from a more affluent background, or
> > > > actually younger. All through undergrad we used punch cards submitted
> > > > to the data center wrapped in rubber bands. The punch card machines
> > > > were hidden in stairwells around campus. Terminal time was too
> > > > expensive for our department... The National Labs were more
> > > > sophisticated – batch processing through modeling programs... but
> > > > surprisingly a summer job at a start up was even better. We were
> doing
> > > > a networked instrumentation system for nuclear power plants:
> > > > Instrumentation carts polled by PDP-11s reporting to redundant VAX
> > > > 11780s driving graphical displays that communicated state information
> > > > to the control room... I think about the same time an economics
> > > > teacher from high school was using a Tandy or TRS 80 to predict
> > > > football opponents' play calling tendencies based on game context:
> > > > down, distance, clock,...  Anyway, I don't think you are the oldest.
> >
> > > > Ed
> >
> > > > On May 6, 9:12 am, baldmountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > The prizes are nice, but that is not what it's about. It's a new
> > > > > platform to explore that is not Windows. With the BeOS it was about
> a
> > > > > new OS designed using the latest software engineering techniques
> > > > > rather than as a mutation of an OS designed in the 70s for a 8 bit
> > > > > microprocessor. I love platforms. I love to learn about them and
> take
> > > > > them apart to figure out how all the pieces fit together. The best
> way
> > > > > to do this is to build something using the platform. I wasn't
> planning
> > > > > on submitting anything to the ADC but one thing lead to another and
> > > > > the app I started to explore Android turned into something usable
> so I
> > > > > submitted it. The same thing happened with the BeOS.
> >
> > > > > On May 6, 9:34 am, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Why don't you go mainstream rather then with an unknown operating
> > > > > > system? Only reason I'm with this new operating system is because
> of
> > > > > > the cash prices. Although, now that I look at it my chances are
> quite
> > > > > > slim if not nil.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>


-- 
BQ

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to