I agree. I am sort of in the same boat. I think the real challenge with an absolutely original and innovative idea is selling it. If the app convinced and conveyed the idea in the first 5 minutes, it would be a winner. Mine doesn't exist currently in either wired or wireless world, and I too focussed on the creativity aspect in this phase. Even though the application was neatly done, I guess it failed to catch the judge's attention. The core of the application wasn't even looked at.
Looking at it again I feel this challenge wasn't only about creativity and application development, but also about presentation. If I decide to pitch this again, a lot would need to change in the presentation and useability in my app. On May 10, 5:30 am, dr123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I still can't believe that we were rejected. The idea that was > submitted in my opinion is far greater than facebook and all the > social apps right now. The application sucked yes, i did a part time > job for 1 month alone...just a basic UI. > But the idea....I still am pretty sure that it was read by one or two > people that didn't grasp it's meaning. Wish someone senior at google > took a shot to read the documentation. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to android-challenge@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
