Everybody talk about cooking, weather, call-a-cab, etc.

My motive to cry: Dyno.  See my comments yesterday on
groups.google.com/group/android-challenge/browse_thread/thread/
bf2d9a34f33bac58/ba681f0f90959b45

I discard the option to submit a dyno app due the very low innovation
and potential patent infringement (many similar products on market for
PDA and laptops)
www.google.com/patents?id=-vyjAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4&dq=11/591,027

Or search in Google for patent application# 11/591027 (This isn’t the
final patent yet, is the publication for examination)

.....
21) Appl. No.: 11/591,027 (
22) Filed: Nov. 1, 2006
Related U.S. Application Data (
63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 11/265,707,
filed on Nov. 1, 2005. (
60) Provisional application No. 60/624,210, filed on Nov.
1, 2004. Provisional application No. 60/732,579, filed
on Nov. 1, 2005. Publication Classification (51) Int. Cl. G06F 17/00
(2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl .... 701/1 (57) ABSTRACT A device and
corresponding method for enabling a user to accurately control,
monitor, and evaluate performance of a vehicle. A portable
programmable computer device that a user can readily plug into a
diagnostic connector port of the vehicle for providing the
controlling, monitoring, and evaluating functions. Accurate detection
of the start time of first movement of the vehicle is made based on
data from an accelerometer, independent of the onboard diagnostic
system and its diagnostics port. A clock is started for measuring time
such that the precise time taken to reach the time- stamped first
velocity value from the engine computer via the diagnostic port is
determined. Data from the accelerometer and diagnostic port is
analyzed and selectively used for accurately and reliably correcting
for errors in velocity data from the onboard diagnostic system
including latency error and errors due to the vehicle exhibiting wheel
spin.

Honestly, I think patent infringement will not be a problem with some
additional work, but where is innovation?, the number one criteria.


Other examples:

Ported to android with better graphics and basic database of drag,
weight, etc.
Software runs in several platforms (including cellular and Smartphone
platforms)
www.nology.com/pdadyno.html

$199 version with dedicated accelerometers.
www.gtechpro.com/ss.html

Check the adc pdf screenshots

It was my fault, I misunderstood the concept and I use the wrong
strategy. A little sad, sorry.

javqui
"passion for innovation"


On May 15, 9:13 pm, ajd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 15, 5:16 pm, "Finn Kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > For all of you that are belittling Cooking Capsules (hope I got the name
> > right), why don't you take a good look at the winning list.
>
> > 1) Very few applications do not have clones on the list.
> > 2) A lot of the applications on there are existing ideas ported to Android.
>
> > In my opinion cooking capsules is a good choice for multiple reasons:
>
> > 1) It ties together several different tasks to make them simpler and easier
> > to organize.
> > 2) It is actually unique on the winning list.
> > 3) The overarching goal of the ADC is to help sell phones, and cooking
> > capsules appeals to a different segment of the population.  To make Android
> > very successful it has to have applications for non techies.
>
> Your list was not the official criteria for judging. If it was then
> the cooking app should really won.
>
>
>
> > For the sake of full disclosure, I like to cook, but I hate shopping.  But,
> > there is nothing more I hate than coming back from the store to realize I
> > forgot to buy something on the recipe.  I also like trying out new recipes.
> > Being able to use my phone while in the store to both figure out what I want
> > to make and to check off the ingredients would be great.
>
> Okey you like to cook, just like the judges who declared the cooking
> app a winner.
>
>
>
> > Finn
>
> > P.S.  Ask yourself if you would have had the same problems with ADC had the
> > judges realized how super cool your app was and you had won.  Perhaps your
> > application was not good or hard to test, you knew this was a content by
> > non-technical judges so you should have prepared for it.  D.S.
>
> I did not submit an application but I still think the cooking app, and
> the other apps as MyCloset, weather channel app, carbon emission
> calculator, call-a-cab, should not fare well against the originally
> given criteria.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-challenge@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to